FINAL NOTICE

PROPOSED ACTION

1.
For the reasons set out in this Final Notice, the Authority hereby takes the
following action against Mr Burton.

2.
The Authority gave Mr Burton the Decision Notice, which notified Mr Burton that,
for the reasons given below and pursuant to section 55J of the Act, the Authority
had decided to cancel Mr Burton’s Part 4A permission.

3.
Mr Burton has not referred the matter to the Tribunal within 28 days of the date on
which the Decision Notice was given to him.

4.
Accordingly, the Authority has today cancelled Mr Burton’s Part 4A permission.

DEFINITIONS

5.
The definitions below are used in this Final Notice (and in the Annex):

“the Act” means the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;

“the Authority” means the Financial Conduct Authority;

“the Decision Notice” means the Decision Notice issued to Mr Burton on 14
September 2016;

“EG” means the Authority’s Enforcement Guide;

“the Handbook” means the Authority’s Handbook of rules and guidance;

“Mr Burton’s Part 4A permission” means the permission granted by the Authority to
Mr Burton pursuant to Part 4A of the Act;

“the Principles” means the Authority’s Principles for Businesses;

“the suitability Threshold Condition” means the threshold condition set out in
paragraph 2E of Schedule 6 to the Act;


“SUP” means the section of the Handbook entitled ‘Supervision Manual’;

“the Threshold Conditions” means the threshold conditions set out in Schedule 6 to
the Act;

“the Tribunal” means the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber); and

“the Warning Notice” means the Warning Notice issued to Mr Burton on 22 August
2016.

RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS

6.
The statutory and regulatory provisions relevant to this Final Notice are set out in
the Annex.

SUMMARY OF THE REASONS

7.
On the basis of the facts and matters and conclusions described in the Warning
Notice and in the Decision Notice, it appears to the Authority that Mr Burton is
failing to satisfy the suitability Threshold Condition, in that the Authority is not
satisfied that Mr Burton is a fit and proper person having regard to all the
circumstances.

8.
Mr Burton has failed to notify the Authority of a change in the address and
telephone number of his principal place of business and has failed to deal openly
and co-operatively with the Authority (in not providing up-to-date contact details).

FACTS AND MATTERS

9.
Mr Burton was authorised by the Authority on 9 June 2015 to conduct consumer
credit business.

10.
Correspondence sent by the Authority to the postal address last notified to the
Authority as Mr Burton’s principal place of business on 26 September 2015 and 12
May 2016 has been returned with the annotation “addressee gone away”.

11.
The Authority attempted to contact Mr Burton on 22 February 2016 on the last
telephone number Mr Burton provided to the Authority. The Authority was unable
to connect the call as the telephone number was vacant.

12.
Correspondence sent by the Authority on 23 February 2016 and 12 May 2016 to
the email address last notified to the Authority by Mr Burton has been returned
undelivered.

13.
Accordingly, it appeared to the Authority that Mr Burton had failed to notify the
Authority of a change in the address and telephone number for his principal place
of business.

FAILINGS

14.
As set out in the facts and matters described above, the Authority has made
repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact Mr Burton using the postal address,
email address and telephone number held by the Authority in relation to Mr Burton.

15.
The Authority has concluded, on the basis of the facts and matters described
above, that Mr Burton:

a. has failed to notify the Authority of a change in the address and telephone

number of his principal place of business contrary to SUP 15.5.4R(1) and SUP
15.5.5R(1) respectively;

b. has failed to deal openly and co-operatively with the Authority in breach of

Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) of the Principles (in not providing up-
to-date contact details);

c. has not demonstrated that he is ready, willing and organised to comply with

the requirements and standards under the regulatory system, namely the
requirements in SUP 15.5.4R(1) and SUP 15.5.5R(1) to give the Authority
reasonable advance notice of a change in his principal place of business and
telephone number, and the date of the change;

d. has therefore failed to satisfy the Authority that his business is being

managed in such a way as to ensure that his affairs will be conducted in a
sound and prudent manner or that he is a fit and proper person having regard
to all the circumstances; and

e. is therefore failing to satisfy the suitability Threshold Condition in relation to

his permitted regulated activities,

and accordingly, Mr Burton’s Part 4A permission should be cancelled.

DECISION MAKER

16.
The decision which gave rise to the obligation to give this Final Notice was made by
the Regulatory Decisions Committee.

IMPORTANT

17.
This Final Notice is given to Mr Burton in accordance with section 390(1) of the Act.

18.
The Authority must publish such information about the matters to which this Final
Notice relates as the Authority considers appropriate. The information may be
published in such manner as the Authority considers appropriate. However, the
Authority may not publish information if such information would, in the opinion of
the Authority, be unfair to Mr Burton or prejudicial to the interests of consumers.

19.
The Authority intends to publish such information about the matter to which this
Final Notice relates as it considers appropriate.

Authority Contact

20.
For more information concerning this matter generally, Mr Burton should contact
Dilip Vekariya at the Authority (direct line: 0207 066 5520).

John Kirby
Enforcement and Market Oversight Division




































RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS

1.
Section 55J(1) of the Act provides that the Authority may cancel a firm’s Part 4A
permission where, amongst other things—

“it appears to the [Authority] that—

(a)
[the firm] is failing, or is likely to fail, to satisfy the threshold

conditions …;

2.
The suitability Threshold Condition provides:

“[The firm] must be a fit and proper person having regard to all the
circumstances, including—

[…]

(d)
whether
[the
firm]
has
complied
and
is
complying
with

requirements imposed by the [Authority] in the exercise of its
functions, or requests made by the [Authority], relating to the
provision of information to the [Authority] and, where [the firm]
has so complied or is so complying, the manner of that compliance;

[…]

(f)
whether [the firm's] business is being, or is to be, managed in such
a way as to ensure that its affairs will be conducted in a sound and
prudent manner;

[…].”

RELEVANT HANDBOOK PROVISIONS

3.
In exercising its power to cancel a Part 4A permission, the Authority must have
regard to guidance published in the Handbook. The relevant main considerations
in relation to the action specified above are set out below.

Relevant Principle

4.
Principle 11 (Relations with regulators) of the Principles (PRIN 2.1.1R) provides:

“A firm must deal with [the Authority] in an open and cooperative way,

and must disclose to [the Authority] appropriately anything relating to the

firm of which [the Authority] would reasonably expect notice.”

Relevant Rules

5.
SUP 15.5.4R provides:

“A firm must give the [Authority] reasonable advance notice of a change in
any of the following addresses, and give details of the new address and the
date of the change:


(1)
the firm’s principal place of business in the United Kingdom;

6.
SUP 15.5.5R provides:

“A firm must give the [Authority] reasonable advance notice of a change in
any of the following telephone numbers, and give details of the new telephone
number and the date of the change:


(1)
the number of the firm’s principal place of business in the United

Kingdom;

[…].”

Guidance concerning the suitability Threshold Condition

7.
Guidance on the suitability Threshold Conditions is set out in COND 2.5.


8.
COND 2.5.2G states that the Authority will take into consideration anything that
could influence a firm’s continuing ability to satisfy the threshold conditions set
out in paragraph 2E of Schedule 6 to the Act.

9.
COND 2.5.6G states that examples of the kind of particular considerations to
which the Authority may have regard when assessing whether a firm will satisfy,
and continue to satisfy, the suitability Threshold Condition include whether:


the firm has been open and co-operative in all its dealings with the
Authority and is ready, willing and organised to comply with the
requirements and standards under the regulatory system (COND
2.5.6G(1));


the firm has contravened, amongst other things, the provisions of the
regulatory system, which include the Principles and other rules (COND
2.5.6G(4)).



OTHER RELEVANT REGULATORY PROVISIONS

10.
The Authority’s policy in relation to its enforcement powers is set out in EG,
certain provisions of which are summarised below.

Cancelling a firm’s Part 4A permission on the Authority’s own initiative

11.
EG 8.1.1(1) provides that the Authority may use its own initiative power to vary

or cancel the permission of an authorised person under section 55J of the Act,
where the person is failing or is likely to fail to satisfy the Threshold Conditions
for which the Authority is responsible.

12.
EG 8.5.1(1) states that the Authority will consider cancelling a firm’s Part 4A

permission using its own initiative power contained in section 55J of the Act in
circumstances where the Authority has very serious concerns about the firm, or
the way its business is or has been conducted.

13.
EG 8.5.2 provides examples of the types of circumstances in which the Authority
may cancel a Part 4A permission. One such example is the failure to provide the
Authority with valid contact details or failure to maintain the details provided,
such that the Authority is unable to communicate with the firm (EG 8.5.2(6)).